Page 1 of 1
Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:08 am
by JJ4SDR
Playing with "Buffer size" on the DSP->Options form. For some reason the buffer sizes don't get saved. Why would that be?
Best,
Juha
NI2M
Oh, I see, I assume that for the changes to save I will need to resave my TX profile.
Re: Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:36 am
by K1LSB
Yep, sometimes when I'm playing in the settings I'll enable the Transmit tab's "Highlight TX Profile Save Items" so I'm kept aware of what gets saved with a TX Profile.
Mark
- Capture.jpg (90.98 KiB) Viewed 5834 times
Re: Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 2:04 am
by JJ4SDR
Thanks for that reminder Mark! How did I overlook this (and who knows how many other features) feature
!
Re: Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 10:22 am
by rbduck
K1LSB wrote:Yep, sometimes when I'm playing in the settings I'll enable the Transmit tab's "Highlight TX Profile Save Items" so I'm kept aware of what gets saved with a TX Profile.
Mark
Capture.jpg
Mark,
I don't want to get too far off the topic but I was wondering. Most items I have read about filter type indicate it is preferential to run "linear phase." I haven't played with these settings yet. Any particular reason you are running "low latency?" Just curious.
Re: Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 7:38 pm
by K1LSB
Ruben,
Great question! Five years ago I did some A/B testing of the audio quality between Low Latency and Linear Phase and posted the results in this forum, and neither Scott nor myself could discern any difference in the audio. Given that Low Latency is, well, low latency, I decided that's the way I'm going forward.
Here's that thread (the audio files have been removed but the thread history remains):
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4081&p=18624&hilit=scott+recording#p18604Mark
Re: Buffer sizes don't save - Why?
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 11:14 am
by rbduck
K1LSB wrote:Ruben,
Great question! Five years ago I did some A/B testing of the audio quality between Low Latency and Linear Phase and posted the results in this forum, and neither Scott nor myself could discern any difference in the audio. Given that Low Latency is, well, low latency, I decided that's the way I'm going forward.
Here's that thread (the audio files have been removed but the thread history remains):
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4081&p=18624&hilit=scott+recording#p18604Mark
That's quite an interesting thread Mark. Thanks for sharing that. I'm going to try low latency for awhile. With my hearing diminishing as it is, I'll take anything that improves audio quality. Thanks again!